©2024 Phil Wieland
|
Train Service Performance at Huyton - July 2012
Date | Scheduled | Trains Run | On Time | Within 5 min. | Comments |
1 | 56 | 56 | (100.0%) | 44 | (78.6%) | 51 | (91.1%) | |
2 | 157 | 157 | (100.0%) | 143 | (91.1%) | 154 | (98.1%) | |
3 | 157 | 157 | (100.0%) | 144 | (91.7%) | 156 | (99.4%) | |
4 | 157 | 157 | (100.0%) | 132 | (84.1%) | 153 | (97.5%) | |
5 | 157 | 157 | (100.0%) | 128 | (81.5%) | 147 | (93.6%) | |
6 | 164 | 158 | (96.3%) | 95 | (57.9%) | 118 | (72.0%) |
Landslip at Garswood. Line closed 15:30 to 16:20, services disrupted for some time afterwards.
|
7 | 164 | 162 | (98.8%) | 108 | (65.9%) | 138 | (84.1%) | |
8 | 56 | 56 | (100.0%) | 44 | (78.6%) | 50 | (89.3%) | |
9 | 157 | 154 | (98.1%) | 128 | (81.5%) | 145 | (92.4%) | |
10 | 157 | 156 | (99.4%) | 120 | (76.4%) | 144 | (91.7%) | |
11 | 150 | 150 | (100.0%) | 121 | (80.7%) | 145 | (96.7%) |
Logging system down 12:49 to 14:08. At least two trains were over 15 minutes late during this period.
|
12 | 157 | 152 | (96.8%) | 114 | (72.6%) | 130 | (82.8%) |
Signalling problem at Earlestown. 10:15 - 11:15
|
13 | 164 | 162 | (98.8%) | 123 | (75.0%) | 146 | (89.0%) | |
14 | 165 | 165 | (100.0%) | 116 | (70.3%) | 142 | (86.1%) |
Signalling problem between Edge Hill and South Parkway. 15:00 - 16:40
|
15 | 56 | 56 | (100.0%) | 39 | (69.6%) | 48 | (85.7%) | |
16 | 157 | 157 | (100.0%) | 130 | (82.8%) | 150 | (95.5%) | |
17 | 157 | 157 | (100.0%) | 122 | (77.7%) | 147 | (93.6%) | |
18 | 155 | 155 | (100.0%) | 132 | (85.2%) | 146 | (94.2%) |
Problems with live departure system 16:50 - 18:30, some data may be inaccurate.
|
19 | 157 | 157 | (100.0%) | 115 | (73.2%) | 138 | (87.9%) | |
20 | 164 | 163 | (99.4%) | 110 | (67.1%) | 140 | (85.4%) | |
21 | 164 | 163 | (99.4%) | 127 | (77.4%) | 151 | (92.1%) | |
22 | 56 | 56 | (100.0%) | 41 | (73.2%) | 48 | (85.7%) | |
23 | 157 | 157 | (100.0%) | 124 | (79.0%) | 150 | (95.5%) | |
24 | 157 | 157 | (100.0%) | 129 | (82.2%) | 149 | (94.9%) | |
25 | 157 | 157 | (100.0%) | 124 | (79.0%) | 152 | (96.8%) | |
26 | 157 | 155 | (98.7%) | 103 | (65.6%) | 137 | (87.3%) | |
27 | 164 | 164 | (100.0%) | 128 | (78.0%) | 156 | (95.1%) | |
28 | 164 | 164 | (100.0%) | 142 | (86.6%) | 158 | (96.3%) | |
29 | 56 | 56 | (100.0%) | 47 | (83.9%) | 54 | (96.4%) | |
30 | 157 | 156 | (99.4%) | 128 | (81.5%) | 152 | (96.8%) | |
31 | 157 | 156 | (99.4%) | 114 | (72.6%) | 139 | (88.5%) | |
July | 4410 | 4385 | (99.4%) | 3415 | (77.4%) | 4034 | (91.5%) | |
Notes
- The figures are derived from the public live departure board systems. These do not always correspond precisely to actual train running.
- Trains cancelled by planned engineering works are not counted as a cancellation. (As long as they are removed from the departure board system.)
- Rail replacement buses are not counted, since running information is not available.
- Trains running within two minutes of correct time are deemed to be on time. I also show trains within five minutes, the railway's standard.
|